callmemadam: (Default)
On 23rd February at 8.30 Lucy Worsley investigates what the Blitz Spirit means, by looking at the lives of people who lived through it. One of them is Frances Faviell, author of the wonderful A Chelsea Concerto, which I reviewed here.

I think it’s the best book about the Blitz I’ve ever read and have been pressing it on people ever since first reading it. I was alerted to the programme by Dean Street Press, who published the book as part of its Furrowed Middlebrow series. They are rightly proud of this because such a book should not have been out of print for so long.
callmemadam: (reading)
Yet again, I find myself re-reading books I know I’ll enjoy. In October it was a couple of delightful books by Eva Ibbotson. I’m getting so disillusioned with ‘the modern novel’ that I’m reading more non-fiction. Ben Macintyre never lets me down and I picked Operation Mincemeat when it was a Kindle 99p deal. This is the story of the wartime deception operation better known as The Man Who Never Was, due to the famous book and film of that name. I followed this by re-reading Duff Cooper’s novella Operation Heartbreak, published in 1950. I learned from Macintyre that Cooper’s book was the first public revelation that a dead body, carrying fake documents intended to fool the Germans as to where the invasion of southern Europe would take place, was dropped off the Spanish coast to be discovered. There was a possibility of Cooper being prosecuted under the Official Secrets Act but he said that if charged, he would say that he got the information direct from Churchill. His book is nothing like the truth. Most of the story is about an invented dim but honourable professional soldier, whose body was eventually used. The Man Who Never Was was the work of Ewen Montagu, one of the originators of the plan and was more accurate. Plenty of people objected to this, too but the book became a bestseller.

When I found myself (horrors!) with no book waiting to be read. I browsed books I could get free with my Prime membership and borrowed
A Quiet Life in the Country, the Lady Hardcastle Mystery 1 by T E Kinsey. I’m absolutely loving it and now want to read the whole series. If you like what the Americans call ‘cozy mysteries’, this series is for you.
callmemadam: (reading)


A Knife for Harry Dodd is another Inspector Littlejohn adventure by George Bellairs. So far, I’ve enjoyed all the ones I’ve read. Harry Dodd is an agreeable, popular chap, who’s made a mistake. He had an affair with a younger woman and now shares a house with her and her mother, while leading a separate life. The women are generally disliked. Who dislikes Harry Dodd enough to kill him? That’s the mystery Littlejohn has to solve and the answer lies within the complicated relationships of the Dodd family. I liked this until the last chapter or so, when the solution seemed a little too pat. Bellairs is one of those crime writers being reprinted whom I think is worth the effort.
This was the most recent Crime Classics Club offering, which the publishers now make available through NetGalley.
more )
callmemadam: (reading)


The brilliant collaboration between Scott of the Furrowed Middlebrow blog and the enterprising Dean Street Press has resulted in nine new issues of out of print books by women authors. They’re available from 3rd October (how can it be so nearly October already?). I actually looked forward to writing this post because I love to be able to recommend a book wholeheartedly. The book in question is the first one I read: A Chelsea Concerto by Frances Faviell. I loved it.
this book and others )
callmemadam: (studygirl)


Imagine finding out that your husband and your father are murderers. Then imagine finding that they are responsible for thousands of deaths. This is the situation of Hedda, once a beautiful Berlin socialite taking no interest in politics: ‘No one ever mentioned “das Judische problem” in the Schroeder household.’ Now she’s unhappily married to handsome Walter Gunther, a high ranking SS officer. By the end of the book her eyes have been opened and she’s a different woman.

When I started this book I wondered if I’d be able to get through it. Even when you already know the facts, reading about a meeting of high ranking officials who are calmly discussing the best methods of killing people is almost too distressing. Luckily, this being fiction, interest in the characters and their fate kept me reading. Although Germany’s military victories (and defeat by the RAF, yay!) are mentioned, the book is about the internal politics of a Germany where the law, medical ethics and Christianity are twisted to justify the cold blooded murder of ‘mentally impaired and chronically ill lebensunwertes leben – those deemed medically to be “unworthy of life” and subjected to what the Führer termed “mercy death,’ And, of course, the Jews.

Walter is a devoted servant of the Reich, anxious to be noticed as such by the high command and willing to obey any order. Karl Muller is a completely different character. Trained as an engineer and then as a doctor, it’s rather a mystery how he managed to achieve a high rank in the SS and be responsible for engineering gas chambers. Unlike Walter, Karl takes no pleasure in his work; he is at first sickened and then wracked by guilt: ‘Karl turned to prayer as an alternative to suicide.’ Karl and Hedda had met years before and their lives become linked again, although not romantically. Karl finds his own method of resistance, knowing where it will lead. Hedda has to deal with a violent husband and a threat to one of her children and becomes a braver person and a more loving mother as a result.

Thérèse Down has written this book to honour those who were part of the lesser known (and mostly Christian) resistance in the newly barbaric Germany. She’s done so successfully and although it’s fiction, The End of Law is a useful addition to the history of the period.

I read this book courtesy of NetGalley.
callmemadam: (gertrude)
lebensborn

Erika Matko was born in Cilli, in what was then Yugoslavia, in 1941. Yet she grew up in Germany as Ingrid von Oelhafen. She was a child of Lebensborn. Lebensborn. It means literally ‘fountain of life’ and was one of Himmler’s barmier ideas. Worried that the German population was declining and would become smaller still as a result of war, he planned to ensure the future of the master race by promoting childbirth amongst German women. Large families were encouraged. No stigma was to be attached to a German woman who had an illegitimate child (providing both parents had suitable ‘Aryan’ ancestry and characteristics) but she and her child would be cared for in a Lebensborn home. Worse than this was the kidnapping of children from the occupied territories; babies literally snatched from their mothers’ arms, to be part of a ‘Germanisation’ programme. Erika was one of those children. At only nine months old (!) she was deemed to have the desirable Aryan characteristics and so began her life as a Lebensborn child.

The now ‘Ingrid’ was never adopted but fostered by Hermann von Oelhafen, a career soldier, and his much younger wife Gisela. They lived in Gisela’s family home, a farmhouse in Bundekow, Mecklenberg. So Ingrid’s earliest years were spent in comparative rural tranquility. When the war ended, Germans living in the wrong place had one idea: to escape from the advancing Russian army and into Allied territory. Gisela showed great resourcefulness in getting herself and two children into what would soon be West Germany. She went to her family in Hamburg, where Ingrid grew up.

From an early age, Ingrid knew that she and her brother were foster children, but she didn’t learn this from her mother, who throughout her life obstructed Ingrid’s attempts to find out who she was. Ingrid trained as a physiotherapist, like her mother, and eventually took over her practice, specialising in treating disabled children. She made a life and a rewarding career, had friends, but was never close to her mother or able to find out why she had once been called Erika. She was fifty eight before she began serious research and the impetus for it came from outside: a call from the Red Cross. This led to years of frustrating writing of letters and delving into archives. Who are you, when you have no birth certificate? Supposing the authorities in the former Yugoslavia deny that you exist? She also found that even so many years after the war and in spite of the Nazis’ obsessive record keeping, the German authorities remained secretive about certain sensitive subjects. She did eventually discover her true origins but only with the help of professionals specialising in cases like hers

Ingrid had been warned that she might find the truth upsetting and she did, but was still glad to know. And what of this obscene plan, this Lebensborn? When Ingrid was eventually persuaded to meet other people who had been Lebensborn children, she found herself with a group of perfectly ordinary people in their sixties, displaying no signs that they might have been Übermensch. The scheme was not only wicked but based on bad science. Reading this book was a salutary reminder for me of the luck of being born English :-). Some of these people are only ten years or so older than I am, yet how easy my life has been compared with theirs!

Hitler’s Forgotten Children is a really interesting book on a little known subject and we have to admire Ingrid for telling her story, which must have been painful for her. My thanks to Elliott & Thompson for sending me a copy.
callmemadam: (Dickens)
crookedheart

This book from the library has a quote on the cover from India Knight: ‘I’m putting Crooked Heart on the shelf of my most treasured books, between I Capture the Castle and The Pursuit of Love …I couldn’t love it more.’
This is very misleading. If you were to think this book is remotely like either of those old favourites, or that it could hold the same place in your heart, you’d be doomed to disappointment. But, like Ms Knight, I did love this book; so much that I didn’t want to finish it.

It’s about wartime and people who live on the edge. Lissa Evans has a wonderful ability to evoke a sense of time and place and to create remarkable characters. I defy anyone not to fall for the child, Noel. At ten years old, he’s been living in Hampstead with his godmother, Mattie, a former suffragette. She talks to him as if he were an adult so, not surprisingly, he’s very precocious for his age. Poland was being invaded and the summer holidays were almost over. On the Saturday before the start of the Michaelmas term, Noel went to the library. He had read every Lord Peter Wimsey on the shelves, and every Albert Campion. The tall librarian with the moustache suggested he tried a thriller instead of a detective story. ‘You’ll find Eric Ambler very good,’ she said.’ Mattie doesn’t want him to be evacuated and Noel doesn’t want to go. Eventually he has to and finds himself boarded with Vee in St Albans. Vee is a mercurial character who never has enough money and is always looking for ways to make more, not always honestly. She’s confused by Noel, whom she accuses of talking Latin at her, but finds that when it comes to managing in wartime, he’s sharper than she is.

There is another plotline, about Vee’s son and his dishonest activities but it’s the Noel/Vee relationship which matters. The book shows the other side of the ‘in the war we all pulled together’ memory which people like. This is a world of spivs, skivers and dishonest ARP wardens who steal from bombed houses. ‘Everybody’s at it,’ is the attitude. For all his apparent sophistication, Noel nearly gets himself into great danger, alone in London during the Blitz. Surprisingly, considering her usual selfishness, Vee worries about him: ‘He’s ten years old!’ She hunts for him and the odd couple find a way of creating a new life together. This book is funny, sad, poignant, utterly beguiling. I want everyone to read it.
callmemadam: (thinking)
andreeswar

The stories of Odette and Violette Szabo are well known in Britain, largely due to the films about them. We know far less about French heroines of the Resistance and Francelle Bradford White is seeking to put this right with her biography of her mother, Andrée Griotteray. She has based the book on conversations with her mother and uncle over many years and on Andrée’s diaries, using secondary sources for the historical background, which is very complicated.

The Griotterays were a prosperous bourgeois family, able to afford good food and clothes, to travel and to educate their children. Andrée was sent to England for a year when she was sixteen and her younger brother Alain spent a few months in Germany. When war broke out in 1939 Andrée was just nineteen and Alain seventeen. Andrée reflected that her own mother Yvonne, who was Belgian, had been the same age when living in occupied Brussels in 1914. What a sad generation, to have lived through two world wars!

Soon after the occupation, Andrée obtained a job in police headquarters in Paris, working in the passport department. She disliked working for an organisation which collaborated with the Wehrmacht (this is still so hard for the French to come to terms with) but the work offered an opportunity to play her part in resisting the Germans. From the start, she took great risks. She smuggled out blank identity cards, hoping their loss would go unnoticed. Alain founded an undercover newspaper, La France, which she secretly printed at work. She also kept a diary, in itself a dangerous thing to do. The diary is touching in its juxtaposition of war news with a young woman’s preoccupation with clothes, boyfriends and, as the war went on, the search for food. Whenever Andrée was able to have a good meal, she recorded it.
more )
callmemadam: (Kindle)
stonyground

In his brilliant introduction, Richard Overy (author of The Bombing War), points out that although this book is fiction, it is ‘not fictitious’. Leslie Mann (1914 – 1989) joined the RAF in 1939. He flew as a tail gunner until being shot down over Germany in June 1941 during a raid on Düsseldorf, and taken prisoner. It’s thought that he wrote this fictional account of life in Bomber Command sometime in the late 1940s.

The story is written in the third person, describing exactly what Mann’s fictional alter ego, Pilot Officer Mason, did and thought during one day and night while on ‘ops’. The style is spare: ‘Mason did this, Mason thought that’ but the terseness only adds to the sense of grim reality in the account. At the time Mann/Mason was a ‘Bomber Boy’, British airmen were flying Armstrong Whitworth Whitley bombers, already out of date and unreliable. Raids on German industrial sites had been authorised to show that Britain was taking some action against Germany and to raise morale at home. In reality, the ratio of loss of life and machines to bombing success was so poor that these raids were largely futile and the deaths of trained air crew not worth the results. It’s horrible to think of nineteen and twenty-year-olds being sent off to pointless doom in this way. Mann/Mason was very aware of this, which accounts for the bitterness in his story.

Mason describes life on the station: a visit to the local pub, a dance in the mess, a chance encounter with an attractive girl. The preparations he makes for the night’s flight are given in detail, as are the actions of the crew. Once they’re underway, the sense of claustrophobia inside the plane is palpable. Imagine being the rear gunner, exposed in that little Perspex bubble; the navigator, whom everyone depended on to get them to their target and safely back, when they were hundreds of miles from home and solid ground; the pilot, responsible for the safety of his crew. And everyone afraid. This is no Dam Busters.

The bald narrative of events is mixed throughout with Mason’s reflections: on past sorties, on lost friends and comrades (too many), on reasons for fighting. When a new boy asks Mason what an op is like, he replies laconically, ‘Not so bad.’ This is what he’s really thinking:
What could you tell these first-trippers? That it was bloody awful, frightening, sickeningly so, and more often fatal? That each trip got worse? That each time you got back you could hardly believe it? That the ground seemed so solid and firm and friendly and you were just about to feel happy when you realised that it only meant you were alive to go again, and again, and then again, until God knows when?

Pondering on death, as he does almost all the time, he wonders,
Was defeat more bitter than death, was death sweeter than defeat? He supposed so, but he didn’t at this moment really understand it, because death could be achieved any time, in dozens of ways – if defeat was so bad – without taking the lives of others. Living was the difficulty, not dying.
He also makes it clear that he and others he knew were not fighting on, even when they were afraid, for some nebulous idea of sacrificing their lives for their country.
That was the great thing – to be alive at the end of the war with a conscience that was clear and open to inspection and criticism. It had nothing to do with patriotism.
As he makes clear, fear is not the same thing as cowardice; fear was natural.

This is a short book and I think it would be best read at one sitting, to get the feeling of real time, as in Len Deighton’s Bomber. I read this book courtesy of NetGalley and gave it five of five stars, unusually for me. I understand that it’s being published in collaboration with the Imperial War Museum. That’s just as it should be because, in my opinion, this little book deserves to be a wartime classic for its exploration of how it felt to be actively engaged in combat. It will be published by Icon Books on September 4th and I hope it has great success.
callmemadam: (studygirl)
Seventy years today since Churchill made his famous ‘We shall fight on the beaches’ speech. Listening to it, tears come into my eyes every time he gets to ‘we shall never surrender.’ The speech was made in the House of Commons.

We shall go on to the end, we shall fight in France, we shall fight on the seas and oceans, we shall fight with growing confidence and growing strength in the air, we shall defend our Island, whatever the cost may be, we shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender,

What of the myth that when the speech was broadcast, it was read by Norman Shelley? Robert Rhodes James said it was just that, a myth. I’m more convinced by Rhodes James, a reputable historian, than by David Irving.

Profile

callmemadam: (Default)
callmemadam

August 2024

S M T W T F S
    123
456789 10
11121314151617
18192021222324
2526 2728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 13th, 2026 09:41 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios