callmemadam: (reading)
I can just imagine some people sneering at the very idea of reading a book by a romantic novelist as a painless way of learning about Waterloo. Let me tell you that Georgette Heyer’s research for An Infamous Army was impeccable. The story begins in Brussels where not just troops but fashionable English people fill the town. Naturally there is an apparently ill-starred romance but Waterloo is central. While all is still quiet, a group of the main characters set off on a day’s pleasure excursion in the nearby countryside. While there, they have pointed out to them Quatre Bras, the hollow road and the houses of Hougoumont and La Haie Sainte. For them, it’s a charming view. For anyone knowing anything about the coming battle, the names suggest impending doom.

Whether it’s ladies’ fashions or troops’ uniforms, you can bet that every detail will be correct. This is also true of Heyer’s description of the battle, which tallies with everything I’ve ever read about it. This is not pretty reading, as she doesn’t spare the reader the gore, while giving a vivid account of the fog and chaos of war. As Andrew Roberts said, Wellington was ‘here, there and everywhere’, rallying his men. At the end of the book, the love story is resolved but, fittingly, Heyer ends with Wellington writing his reports.

I’d also strongly recommend a social history of the period, Jenny Uglow’s In These Times, which I reviewed here in 2014. It’s about what it was like to live in Britain during years of fighting. Some people may be surprised to learn how much support there was in England for Napoleon.
callmemadam: (Kindle)
inthesetimes

In These Times is exactly what the title suggests, the story of what it was like to live through the French wars. By drawing extensively on private diaries and letters as well as works published at the time, Jenny Uglow has brought a wonderful sense of immediacy to the reaction to great events taking place overseas. In 1793, as in 1914 or 1939, the writers didn’t know what the outcome of the war would be and they express their fears freely. We learn how the war was affecting bankers, manufacturers, farmers, families. One word is constantly repeated: trade. When trade was good, the well-to-do prospered and the poor were fed. When it was bad, banks and businesses failed and ‘Soup kitchens were back in the streets.’ In bad times, people were quick to blame the government and to demand peace. ‘Cobbett and others were now attacking the aristocracy and landed classes as parasites living off the nation, profiting from the war, showing how they influenced elections and made vast sums out of posts, sinecures and fees, patronage, colonies and customs.’ There was a surprising amount of support for Napoleon; Hazlitt, for instance, never ceased to admire him.

I found it pleasing to read how very bloody minded the British were, then as now, at any infringement of what they then termed their ‘liberties’. The press gang, new taxes, the ‘Defence of the Realm Act, passed on 5 April 1798, (which) required county and parish officials to ask every man between fifteen and sixty about his willingness to fight in an invasion, and if he would do so outside his own area.’ were all vigorously attacked, on paper and in physical actions. These were turbulent times: mobs, riots, arson and general disturbances, all savagely put down. We may complain of constant surveillance, but we don’t have soldiers on street corners. Yet.
more )

Profile

callmemadam: (Default)
callmemadam

August 2024

S M T W T F S
    123
456789 10
11121314151617
18192021222324
2526 2728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 9th, 2025 05:24 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios