Fifty Books a Child Should Read
Mar. 26th, 2011 10:16 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Michael Gove, the Education Secretary, has said that every child should read fifty books a year. I read a great deal more myself as a child but how is number crunching to help reluctant readers? It seems a goal without a point; surely books should be read for pleasure and to expand the mind rather than to meet some literacy criterion? A list compiled by various interested parties can be found here from The Independent. It’s notable that apart from Michael Rosen’s choices, almost all the picks are of older, classic books. I like everything on Philip Pullman’s list and I love his comparison of Ransome with Mozart but then I adore both.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-26 10:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-26 10:31 am (UTC)You mean Uncle Lubin, I take it?
I'm sure
no subject
Date: 2011-03-26 10:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-26 02:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-26 06:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-28 06:42 am (UTC)My 11 year old son is an avid reader (a fact for which I am eternally grateful), but also has long days at school (8.30 to 4 pm), a LOT of homework, and takes part in organised sporting activities two evenings a week and on Saturday mornings.
He has a reading age of 14.9 when last tested by the school in Sept, and reads quality children's literature, a lot of which is upwards of 600 pages (currently reading Brisinger which comes in at 747 pages).
There is no way he could read 50 books a year.
However, if a child of six was reading the ever-present-in-schools Oxford Reading Tree picture books,which come in at about 12 pages upwards, then it would clearly be easy to reach Mr Gove's target.
An ill-thought-out comment by the Education Secretary, I feel. Somebody ought to remind him of the old adage of quality versus quantity.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-28 07:27 am (UTC)I really don't think eleven year olds should have a lot of homework!