callmemadam: (reading)
[personal profile] callmemadam
From Mr Pip I moved to reading Great Expectations yet again. I love Dickens but, folks, this is the book for people who think they hate him. Take out Pumblechook and Wopsle and the book seems 'un-Dickensian'. On every re-read I find more in it and it's the style which is so impressive, the beautiful elegiac voice so very modern for a book published in 1860. There's also plenty of excitement: the plot to conceal Magwitch and spirit him away is like a spy story. If you really can't stand reading Dickens, watch David Lean's film instead.

On this reading I felt very let down by the illustrations for the Folio edition, which I picked up recently for a pound. I've known Charles Keeping's work since I read Rosemary Sutcliff's books as a child and the image below shrieks '1960s!' at me.



Now here's Keeping's drawing of Wemmick's house for Great Expectations.



Wrong! And wrong again. All the pictures seem feeble to me and add nothing to the reading of the book, whereas the illustrations for say, Knight's Fee (Sutcliff) are inseperable from my memories of the book. Disappointing but perhaps it just shows how important illustrations are for children's books? Narnia/Pauline Baynes; Ransome/Ransome; Ballet Shoes/Ruth Gervis; Alice/Tenniel; Molesworth/Searle: hard to imagine one without the other.

Date: 2008-07-18 04:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rosathome.livejournal.com
Also Roald Dahl/Quentin Blake.

Date: 2008-07-18 04:40 pm (UTC)

Date: 2008-07-18 06:43 pm (UTC)
lethe1: (thinking)
From: [personal profile] lethe1
And Milne/Shepard.

Date: 2008-07-19 07:04 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] callmemadam.livejournal.com
Yes! Another good example.

Date: 2012-01-10 09:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] glitterboy1.livejournal.com
Folio have been issuing new editions recently, based on the Nonesuch editions from the 1930s. I don't have any of the new Folio ones, but hopefully, they're much better!

Date: 2012-01-11 08:00 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] callmemadam.livejournal.com
I haven't seen any recent Folio editions. It used to be the case that you had to sign up to buy so many in a year but I think they've changed that?

Great Expectations cost me a pound, I think, so was a bargain.

Date: 2012-01-13 09:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] glitterboy1.livejournal.com
They still have the idea of membership (normal requirement: four books per year), which brings with it benefits like member-only sales etc. But yes, my impression is that anyone can now go and buy a single book from them, if they want to.

I haven't rejoined, this year: we're partway through the annual process where they offer ever-greater blandishments until I eventually give in. So far, though, I'm remaining firm...

Profile

callmemadam: (Default)
callmemadam

August 2024

S M T W T F S
    123
456789 10
11121314151617
18192021222324
2526 2728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 3rd, 2026 09:44 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios